“A” Is Filing More Evidence In Case Opposed to Lee Jin Wook

“A” Is Filing More Evidence In Case Opposed to Lee Jin Wook

A Is Filing More Evidence In Case Opposed to Lee Jin Wookjun2yng July 17, 2016 0 A Is Submitting More Evidence In Case Against Lee Jin Wook Updated July 18 KST: Lee Jin Wook Put onCommute Ban, Firm Voices Frustrations And Suspicions About Accuser

On July 18, the prison illustration of the lady (hereafter often known as “A”) who filed a complaint of sexual attack against actor Lee Jin Wook made a statement to news retailers that “A” would be submitting an harmfile from the clinic to the police for evidence.

Her legal rep said, “Yesterday (July 17), whilst Lee Jin Wook was once being wondered at the Suseo police station, we submitted quite so much of pieces of evidence to the police, addingpictures of A’s body, bruises, broken clothing, and photos from the scene.”

“A” made up our minds to publishthe extra evidence because of Lee Jin Wook’s non-repentant attitude, in keeping with her legal representative. Lee Jin Wook has so far adamantly refuted the claims made by ability of “A,” pronouncing that she is fast to make false accusations based totallyat the sole reality that he's a public figure.

The legal rep acknowledged to BizEnter, “If Lee Jin Wook sincerely felt regret for his movements and apologized, there would were no explanation why to submit the evidence. If Lee Jin Wook continues with this stance, we can exist submitting more evidence.”

In a equivalentcommentary to Megastar Today, the rep said, Because we just need a trustworthy apology from Lee Jin Wook, we didnt submit further evidence. However, Lee Jin Wooks reactionturns out to be aimed at creating aappear to be a gold-digger, so we're going to be taking more potent action.

RelatedTags Lee Jin Wook Post NavigationOldTaleSo Eul Wins All of theAbsolute best Sister Awards On The Go back Of Superman

Next StoryHi Venus Invitations You To Summer Paradise In New MV

#Lee Jin Wook

Latest Updates on Go Young Wook's Case Found No Evidence of Sexual Assault

Latest Updates on Go Young Wook's Case Found No Evidence of Sexual Assault

Latest Updates on Go Young Wooks Case Found No Evidence of Sexual AssaultAfter the police finished their investigation on the Go Young Wook case, they revealed that they could not find enough evidence for sexual assault.

The Seoul Yongsan Police Station stated on June 4, All we have are statements from the female accusers who claim that they are victims of sexual assault. There is no objective evidence that validates these statements and There are no diagnostic reports of physical damage or records of psychological treatment. So we decided to put down the charges for sexual assault.

Investigations were completed on May 29, and the police decided not to place Go Young Wook in physical detention.

This past March, Go Young Wook was charged with the sexual assault of a certain underage model.  Two more minors also stepped forward with sexual assault charges as well in May.

#

Lee Jin-wook on rape case:

Lee Jin-wook on rape case: "She told me her password", 'A': "I am no longer a con artist"

Actor Lee Jin-wook who is being accused of rape, is claiming that 'A' is a con artist.

According to the filethrough Channel A, Lee Jin-wook reported to police that 'A' gave him her spacedeal with and password below the pretense of asking him to mendanything for her. He also submitted evidence in their conversation.

However, 'A' claimed she never asked him to lend a hand her with anything.

As he used to be making his way to the police station at the 17th, Lee Jin-wook had said, "False accusation is a significant crime if any person thinks they are in a position to put this on me simply becauseI'm famous".

The investigation took 11 hours in which he stated they had sex yet it wasn't under force.

'A's resources are announcing Lee Jin-wook is making her like a feminine con artist and are prepared to combat back with more force.

Meanwhile, 'A' reported Lee Jin-wook of rape on July 15th. It sounds as if they met on July 12th, had a couple ofbeverages and he followed her house where he raped her.

#Lee Jin-wook #news

Lee Jin-wook and his agency:

Lee Jin-wook and his agency: "There used to be no sexual assault, will take felony measures opposed to the accuser"

Lee Jin-wook, who was once sued for sexual assault, has clarified that the accusation isn't true at all and they are going to take sturdy measures opposed to the accuser.

Lee Jin-wook's firm CCO ENS acknowledgedvia their legitimate media unencumber on July 15th, "We're sincerely apologetic for the unsavory state of affairs that has arisen" and "One transparent thing in this condition is that there has been no sexual assault. We're going to take solidprison measures against the accuser".

The agency also said, "Lee Jin-wook will do his best possible to cooperate with the investigation to show the truth". The agency back apologized for Lee Jin-wook's lovers and also thanked the fans who wereappearing unchanging fortify and love below the circumstances.

Prior to the media release by the agency, Lee Jin-wook turned into sued by a girl 'A' in her early 30s on July 14th. 'A' claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Lee Jin-wook and she filed the complaint with the police. Lee Jin-wook's recognition has been brokenparticularly regardless whether the accuser's claim is correct or not.

#Lee Jin-wook #news

Lee Jin-wook and agency:

Lee Jin-wook and agency: "There used to be no sexual assault, will take felony measures opposed to the accuser"

Lee Jin-wook, who used to be sued for sexual assault, has clarified that the accusation isn't true at all and they're going to take sturdy measures opposed to the accuser.

Lee Jin-wook's firm CCO ENS acknowledgedvia their professional media free up on July 15th, "We're sincerely apologetic for the unsavory state of affairs that has arisen" and "One transparent thing in this condition is that there has been no sexual assault. We will take solidfelony measures against the accuser".

The agency also said, "Lee Jin-wook will do his perfect to cooperate with the investigation to expose the truth". The agency back apologized for Lee Jin-wook's enthusiasts and also thanked the fans who had beenappearing unchanging toughen and love below the circumstances.

Prior to the media release by the agency, Lee Jin-wook became sued by a girl 'A' in her early 30s on July 14th. 'A' claimed that she was sexually assaulted by Lee Jin-wook and she filed the complaint with the police. Lee Jin-wook's recognition has been brokenparticularly regardless whether the accuser's claim is right or not.

#Lee Jin-wook #news

Another Girl Steps Forward, Filing Fees  Opposed to Yoochun In Large K-Pop Rape Scandal

Another Girl Steps Forward, Filing Fees Opposed to Yoochun In Large K-Pop Rape Scandal

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterYet any othergirl has come forth to accuse JYJYoochun for sexual assault, bringing the full to no less than six girls who have filed fees with authorities. 

According to reports, the latest accusers description of her come upon with Yoochun matched that of the alternative women, adding that Yoochun also attacked her in the bathroom. Reports added that the maximum recent accuser was once an worker at the adult entertainment facility that Yoochun frequented, and that she had performed a framedisplay for him as well.

While police start to investigate this newest case, it become besidespublished that the primarygirl to accuse Yoochun of sexual attack has re-filed ratesopposed to him in spite ofshedding them remaining month.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

#

First Accuser In Park Yoochun Case Demanded Cash From C-JeS Prior to Filing Police Report

First Accuser In Park Yoochun Case Demanded Cash From C-JeS Prior to Filing Police Report

First Accuser In Park Yoochun Case Demanded Cash From C-JeS Ahead of Filing Police Record jun2yng June 20, 2016 0 First Accuser In Park Yoochun Case Demanded Money From C-JeS Before Filing Police Report In step with reports, the primarygirl who accused Park Yoochun of sexual attack approached Park Yoochun’s agency, C-JeS Entertainment, and proposed a agreement prior to filing the police report.

She acknowledged that because she have been sexually assaulted, she may justnow notreside in Korea. She said that she would move to China, and asked for a settlement of one billion won (approximately $863,000).

However, the particular person thatgot hereto satisfy alongside the firmused to be not the woman, yet the woman’s boyfriend, who is reportedly a member of a gang in Seoul. In the assembly with the agency, he said that he mightdecrease the settlement to 500 million won (approximately $432,000).

Park Yoochun’s agency refused the demands, and later the same day, the 1st sexual assault allegation became filed. Those demands have become the grounds upon which Park Yoochun filed a counter suit of false accusation and blackmail on June 20 opposed to the woman, her boyfriend, and her cousin.

RelatedTags Park Yoochun Post NavigationOutdatedTaleMelody Day Unearths Teasers For First Mini Album Colour

You are viewing the maximum recent post

#Park Yoochun

YG LOSES case opposed to reporter referring to Seungri’s automobile accident

YG LOSES case opposed to reporter referring to Seungri’s automobile accident

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterKorean media reports that YG lost their case opposed to a reporter for allegedly spreading false rumors and libel

Earlier final year, reported that YG Entertainment used to be pursuing a lawsuit for two hundred million Won against reporter recognized every bit G for libel this manner that spreading false rumors to defame anyone or a collection of people.

The reporter used the be aware pharmacy to consult with YG Entertainment and that the district attorney will have toin finding out the factin the back of the use of gear of artists in YG Entertainment after an alleged ex-YG staff, in line with YG Entertainment, became busted for bringing in medication into Korea after attending Large BANGs match overseas.

In addition, the reporter brought up the chanceof giant BANG member Seungri being below the impression of alcohol when he brought about the coincidence back in 2014 after Seungri was now not checked for DUI and left the ambulance on his way to the health center afterwards his manager got hereto select out him up.

After collecting reports, YG Entertainment filed a lawsuit against the reporter K for libel and spreading false rumors to defame YG Entertainment and Seungri.

Korean media reports that the Korean courts governed that reporter K failed to spread rumors that were too out of the line because ofsure facts.

Due to the truth that the ex-YG personnel who was busted for smuggling in medicines was affiliated with YG Entertainment and the fact that there buddiesand the ones that witnessed Seungri drinking prior to the accident, all fees were dropped against the reporter.

Koreaboo has accumulated reactions from Netizens who commented at thecommon article from our Korean source. The beneath comments are the preferred comments at the time of this text being published.

37 / -2 Neatly this article it will most probably be quietly buried soon

35 / -11 I know that enthusiastsmight feel that this isnt fair yet the fact that he didnt get checked for drinking under the influence alcohol suggests that it cant turn out if he either drank or didnt drink prior to the accident. Evidence is not just for proving someone accountable but used to prove innocence as well.

50 / -17 A lot of these articles cant be searched on the hunt engine for some reason. They are the queens of hiding those things.

22 / -7 The Korean courts stated that the police didnt do a DUI take a glance at on him but appearance at all his fans claiming that he did get checked thru articles online lol. Investigate this.

Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

#

Tahiti’s Jisoo’s Case Opposed to Unsolicited Sponsor Provides Will Most probably Remain Unresolved

Tahiti’s Jisoo’s Case Opposed to Unsolicited Sponsor Provides Will Most probably Remain Unresolved

Tahitis Jisoos Case Opposed to Unsolicited Sponsor Provides Will Most probably rest Unresolvedorionight February 18, 2016 0 LINE it!Tahitis Jisoos Case Against Unsolicited Sponsor Gives Will Likely Remain Unresolved With the controversy of sponsorships in the entertainment industry turning into a hot subject lately, it’s simpleto realizethe needto do so against unsolicited advances from sponsorship brokers. Unfortunately for Tahiti’s Jisoo, it kind of feels her case against the broker who contacted her by way of Instagram can be closed unresolved.

On February 18, the Seocho District Police Department issued a statement, pronouncingthey had approached Facebook, which owns and operates Instagram, with a seek warrant for the broker’s account information. However, Facebook spoke back that they were not able to give you thedata in question.

According to the police, the user who sent the sponsorship messages accessed the Net from an in a foreign country IP address. Facebook stated, “If the IP deal withwere in Korea, Facebook would be in a positionto give the asked details. However, because the IP address got here from a 3rd country, Facebook is unable to supply the user’s account information.” Without the help of Facebook, the police have been unable to track the user back to his normal IP address.

The police went directly to state that they've alerted Jisoo and her corporateat the situation, and that the cyber crimes department plans to seem for any otherapproach of apprehending the broker.

Meanwhile, several actresses have pitched in their reviews on the truththis is sponsorship deals following the special broadcast of SBSs “The Its Know.”

What are your mind on Jisoo’s situation?

Related Tags JisooTAHITIPost NavigationOldTaleGFRIEND Takes 10th Win and 1st Triple Crown With Rough on M!Countdown

You are viewing the most recent post

#

Music Videos and the Evidence Opposed to  Creative Freedom

Music Videos and the Evidence Opposed to Creative Freedom

20160213_seoulbeats_RoyalPiratesSong Videos and the Evidence Opposed toCreative FreedomWritten through Sydney On February 15, 2016In the K-pop industry, we normally run across artists in numerous categories. On the topic of music production, we split them into artists that write their own music and artists that experience music written for them. For the artists that write their own music, we recall to mind them as true artists which arelooseto specific themselves in their music. The others are deemed products of the highly regulated K-pop-making machine. However, after keen on IT more, it roughly feels that even the artists that we accept as true with to have ingenious freedom mightif reality exist toldno longer possess it in its entirety.

The Royal Pirates is one of the crucialteams that holds this intended creative freedom. After all, they partake in the production in their own music. However, their MVs appear to propose the idea that there is more at the back of this creative freedom than meets the eye.

In a up to date episode of the After College Club, James talks about the symbolism in the “Run Away” MV and how the scenes constitutemore than a few struggles the Royal Pirates faced. It sounds as if that the symbolic components were created in line withmindfulchoices agreed upon either by the Royal Pirates and by the music video creators. The non-public connections to its symbolic parts likewise suggest that the video is extremely personal, and due to this fact representative of the gang and what they need to express.

Interestingly, some of the music videos that presented them to the K-pop industry was once “Drawing the Line,” in which the staff were shown to be uncomfortable after being herded around and suggested to act like other folks they weren’t. This video implied that the Royal Pirates were other from the common K-pop act because they were in a position to make a laugh of the awkwardness K-pop acts are topic to when pretending to be individuals they are not. It also presented the Royal Pirates as a collection that remains truthful to themselves.

20151025_seoulbeats_iu_chatshireHowever, in the up to nowdiscussed After Faculty Club appearance, James comments that their present album become created with a alternative producer; the album is described as a little more fair and containing more folks in the songs. EXSY also comments that the scenes of the video portraying him blindfolded and chained represented his inability to do what he wanted, yet he was capable ofunlock all of those feelings into the album. This renders the “Drawing the Line” video ironic because they were no longerready to be utterly true to their music style. However, this isn'tto mention that the Royal Pirates had no artistic freedom when writing their music previously, but it issues to the reality that there will have been less artistic freedom concernedwhen compared to the introduction of their maximumfresh album 3.3.

IU is sometimes called an artist that has begun writing her own music, and this time, she was even stuck in a controversy because of her interpretations of Zeze. IUs talent to express her own mind and emotions in her music are evidence of her higher artistic freedom.

Another controversy she faced was because her MV for “Twenty-Three” was criticized as pedophilic. The song itself, on the opposite hand, is set her existence and strife at the age of twenty-three. With the reason from the creators of the music video, we are reminded that IU doesn't make her music videos, and that the Twenty-Three MV was created primarily based on the interpretations the music video creators discovered from her song.

Subsequently, the removal of the video from being the creation of IU herself seems to be a hindrance of IUs artistic expression. After all, IU is in the video, and the song is hers. Those criticisms of the video reflect badly upon her, and she gets pulled into the blame for representing the supposed pedophilia. Of course, we shouldbear in mind that there are humans that concentrate onparticularsides of musical production, and it should not be viable for an artist to take the helm on each aspect. At the similar time, an artist will must havethe proper to have a say in the creation of the videos that they partake in.

BTS is another community known to write their own music, and this freedom to write their own music suggests that they have got got artistic freedom. Interestingly, in their reaction to their MV for “Run,” it seems that they themselves don'ttotallynotice the content of the video. They know the fundamental premise, but are unfamiliar with the details. It can be argued that they simplywould like tocomic story about and be puzzled amongst the audience, but that argument doesn’t in point of fact brand feel because expressing the actualthat means of the video poses no visible problems.

This reminds audience of the fact that BTS does not create their own music videos. BTS could lose some of their artistic freedom with this loss in regulate over the videos they partake in. Although the MVs won't be destructive to the organization itself, they still supply a platform from which BTS can also be judged by. For example, in BTSs Boy in Luv MV, Jin slams a lady against a row of lockers. To viewers, this means that BTS believes and partakes in manhandling women they are attracted to. The belief of the music video then contributes to the insight of the artist, and if the artist has no control over the music video, their artistic expression is compromised.

20151129_seoulbeats_btscliffThis makes one wonder how much vitality music videos hang in the eyes of the public. Is the music more important, or the videos? After possessing artistic freedom by the use of the music, is the area of the video anything else that should be conquered?

For the “Drawing the Line music video, it’s appealing that the plot of the video is beside the point to the lyrical content. The MV is in its place used as a automobileto stress regal Pirates supposed artistic freedom, because the video pokes fun at the conundrum of having to faux to be any person you’re not. Subsequently, the target audience perceives Royal Pirates as a group this is not harshly controlled by some musical tyrant.

However, it appears thatthose who perceived the video in this fashion were deceived. In fact, even perhapsanybody that believes artists have whole artistic freedom are deceived. After all, with a corporation backing them, it best makes sense that the corporate would habitsquality controls on the music to be certain that the music can create the most importantconceivablequantity of revenue. Conversely, even with this quality control, having the ability to write their own music still makes it “theirs,” just perhaps not absolutelythe manner they sought after it to be.

For the music videos of IU and BTS, it does not seem as although their artistic expression is hindered, but being reminded of the fact that they don't create the music videos suggests that there could also beattainable for misinterpretation or meanings that wander away in translation from the music and lyrics to their visual representations. Subsequently, as consumers, we want to pause and take into considerationthe kind ofcreditsallocated to the music video in comparison to that we allot to the music itself.

Going off of this, there also are groups like Tasty that create their own choreography. This is in a the several way of expressing artistic freedom as well. We sometimes think of artistic freedom in terms of music only, and perhapsthat's the virtually important. However, choreography and the picture that they put out during the music videos also is important. Thus, till artists are able to partake in each step of the creation of their music (which contains the music itself, the lyrics, the choreography, and the MV), it turns out that comprehensive artistic freedom won't exist.

20151224_seoulbeats_iu_twentythree_loen_sliderAs for the groups that don’t write their own music, I don’t see how someone can express artistic freedom if they don't have any dominance over the music that they sing. In all probabilitythey are able touploadfacets of themselves in the way that they sing the songs to make it “theirs,” but with reviewsvery identical to that of JYP making Jo Kwon spend 11 hours recording 2AMs debut song This Song, it appears that music creators have a concrete concept of what they would like their song to sound like, and that concept then dictates the way that the artist sings it. The quantity of artistic freedom singers that don't write their own songs wield then relies on the person that writes the song and how bendy they are in terms of ways much they permit the singer to switch the song to slot their style.

The factor of true artistic freedom can even never be resolved, but it's far interesting to imagine how, in this client society, practicallynot anythingmight be attributed to the artist alone. What then becomes of the liberty of artistry? And may it ever be seemingly for these perpetual shackles on artistic freedom to ever be broken?

(YouTube 123456, Naver, Photographsthru YouTube, LOEN Entertainment, Twitter, Facebook)

#