Court Makes Resolution In Tasty Vs. Woollim Entertainment Lawsuit

Court Makes Resolution In Tasty Vs. Woollim Entertainment Lawsuit

Court Makes Resolution In Tasty Vs. Woollim Entertainment Lawsuitnotclaira June 22, 2016 0 Court Makes Decision In Tasty Vs. Woollim Entertainment Lawsuit The Seoul Seocho-gu District Court has given the verdict in Tasty’s lawsuit opposed to SM CC, who owns Woollim Entertainment.

In March, Tasty and SM CC’s representatives met for a court date. As the plaintiff, Tasty argued that their exclusive contract was once invalid and asked for the agreement to be terminated.

The court mentioned on June 23, “We are disregarding the plaintiff’s claim. The plaintiff might bechargeable forall of thepayment of the lawsuit.”

Tasty is a duo composed of Daeryong and Soryong, dual brothers from China who determined to leave their careers in Korea ultimate July after being not able to negotiate with their agency.

As the lawsuit has been dismissed, the contract between Tasty and SM CC probably still stands.

Related Tags TastyPost NavigationOldTaleYoo Seung Ho Handiest Has Superlatives For Park Bo Gum In Interview With The Superstar

You are viewing the maximum recent post

#Tasty

Tasty and SM C&C Speak about Contract Termination Lawsuit at Court

Tasty and SM C&C Speak about Contract Termination Lawsuit at Court

Tasty and SM CC Talk about Contract Termination Lawsuit at Courtkokoberry March 17, 2016 0 LINE it!Tasty and SM CC Discuss Contract Termination Lawsuit at Court Chinese duo Tastys prisonfight amongst Woolim Entertainment and parent corporate SM CC continues.

Previously, Tasty announced plans to halt activities in Korea in July of 2015. Woolim Entertainment spoke back that the duo unilaterally made this resolution without informing the agency. Then Tasty refuted their claims and officially filed a lawsuit to finish their exclusive contract with Woolim Entertainment.

On March 17, lawyers representing each side met for a pleading date at the Seoul Central District Court.

The plaintiff (Tasty)s attorney stated, The plaintiff argues that the exclusive contract itself is invalid. The defendant, SM CC, failed to balance accounts and treated them unfairly. The plaintiff asks for their exclusive contract to be terminated because of unfair remedy and discrimination in comparison to other groups.

Then the defendant (SM CC) said, We established and balanced accounts consistent withthe guidelines for same old exclusive contracts. We can notsettle for how they unilaterally mentioned their contract is invalid.

SM CCs aspect continued, As for no longer balancing accounts, its no longer that they were not paid yet rather that their benefitused to be smaller than the volume invested in comparison. If an firm singer doesn't make a profit, this may also be a loss for the company, so there's noreason whyto regard them unfairly. The plaintiffs claim is unfair. There's no reason to terminate the exclusive contract.

What are your mind on their statements?

Related Tags SM CCTastyWoolim EntertainmentPost NavigationOldTaleFormer WomanCrew Member L Heads in for Wondering in Suspected Prostitution Case

You are viewing the newest post

#

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court Resolution in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court Resolution in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court Resolution in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuitorionight November 9, 2015 0 LINE it!Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court Decision in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit After wasting his case opposed to his former firm for unpaid wages, Yoo Jae Suk has appealed the decision, bringing up the Subcontract Transaction Law.

Yoo Jae Suks attorney told Ilgan Sports on November nine that Yoo Jae Suk is saying that entertainers are indeed subcontractors that experience the right to immediately claim their wages, contrary to the courts decision. Yoo Jae Suk in the beginning brought the case to the courts against his former agency STOM EF for kind ofsix hundred million won (approximately $530,131) in unpaid wages in 2010 alone.

According to Yoo Jae Suks claims, the law can also be interpreted that entertainers can bypass the agency and acquire their contractual wages without delay from the broadcasting companies. Additionally, such an interpretation can be certain that the entertainers who would differently exist powerless will receive their correct wages without reference to any problems their agencies could also be facing.

The attorney additional went directly to state his surprise at how tough Yoo Jae Suk is fighting, now notonly for himself, yet for his fellow entertainers. He said, Yoo Jae Suk told me, There are numerous entertainers who are having this same problem. Theyve asked a stipulation be added to the prerequisitesin their contracts that in terms of a civil suit, it'll be treated at little fee to them.

He continued, If Yoo Jae Suk wins this attraction (thereby mentioning that entertainers can actually be thought to be equally subcontractors), it would have an have an effect on on other identical cases. Because of the Korean tendency as a society toward vertical relationships, the weaker birthday party between two other folks have a difficult time talking their grievances. This sort of victory would grant them the opportunity to be guaranteed their rights and interests.

What do you bring to mind the situation?

Related Tags Yoo Jae SukPost NavigationOldTaleShinhwas Dongwan Presentations Off His Inside Cat Whisperer

Next StoryUpdate: Video Restored Ladies Generations Gee Song Video Has Been Got rid of from YouTube

#

Court Orders Reconciliation in Lawsuit Between JYP Entertainment and Director Han Sa Min

Court Orders Reconciliation in Lawsuit Between JYP Entertainment and Director Han Sa Min

Court Orders Reconciliation in Lawsuit Between JYP Entertainment and Director Han Sa Minkiddy_nights December 13, 2015 0 LINE it!Court Orders Reconciliation in Lawsuit Between JYP Entertainment and Director Han Sa Min The Korean court has ordered reconciliation in the lawsuit between JYP Entertainment on behalf of 2PM, and director Han Sa Min, the CEO of Dexter Lab. Unless one aspect repeals this resolutioninside of two weeks, it'll be presumed that either side are willing to reconcile.

Earlier, JYP Entertainment filed a lawsuit opposed to Han Sa Min because he stopped the filming of 2PMs track video without consulting JYP Entertainment this beyond June. In line with JYP Entertainment, Dexter Lab refused to movie their music video as a result ofwar of hobbybecause ofsome other artists comeback arrangements taking place at the similar time as 2PMs just 4 days earlier than the filming was once scheduled to start.

As a result, 2PM had to extend their comeback schedule, which supposedthey had to scrap their plans and get started from scratch, adding their filming schedule, unencumber of the album, and promotion plans.

However, Dexter Lab refuted this, announcing that There has been no formal contract, and we had now not agreed on a filming agenda anyway.

2PM sooner or laterreplaced their director workforce to a team from Naive Inventive Production and got here back on June 15 with their album No.5.

Related Tags 2PMJYP EntertainmentPost NavigationOutdatedTaleWeekly K-Pop Music Chart 2015 – December Week 2

You are viewing the newest post

#

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court resolution in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court resolution in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit

Yoo Jae Suk Appeals Court Decision in Regards to Unpaid Wages Lawsuit After wasting his case opposed to his former firm for unpaid wages, Yoo Jae Suk has appealed the decision, bringing up the “Subcontract Transaction Law.”

Yoo Jae Suk’s attorney told Ilgan Sports on November nine that Yoo Jae Suk is announcing that entertainers are indeed subcontractors that experience the right to without delay claim their wages, contrary to the court’s decision. Yoo Jae Suk at the beginning brought the case to the courts against his former agency STOM E&F for kind of six hundred million won (approximately $530,131) in unpaid wages in 2010 alone.

According to Yoo Jae Suk’s claims, the law will also be interpreted that entertainers can bypass the agency and get keep of their contractual wages directly from the broadcasting companies. Additionally, such an interpretation can ensure that the entertainers who would differently be powerless will receive their right kind wages without reference to any problems their agencies is also facing.

The attorney additional went directly to state his surprise at how demanding Yoo Jae Suk is fighting, now not only for himself, yet for his fellow entertainers. He said, “Yoo Jae Suk told me, ‘There are numerous entertainers who are having this same problem. They’ve asked a stipulation be added to the stipulations in their contracts that in relation to a civil suit, it'll be treated at little fee to them.’”

He continued, “If Yoo Jae Suk wins this allure (thereby pointing out that entertainers can if reality be told be thought to be as subcontractors), it might have an affect on other identical cases. because of the Korean tendency as a society toward vertical relationships, the weaker celebration between two other folks have a difficult time talking their grievances. This sort of victory would grant them the opportunity to be guaranteed their rights and interests.”

What do you recall to mind the situation?

Source (1)

Related

#

TASTY printed to have filed lawsuit requesting contract termination + Woollim to countersue

TASTY printed to have filed lawsuit requesting contract termination + Woollim to countersue

TASTY published to have filed lawsuit soliciting for contract termination + Woollim to countersue

The duo TASTY and Woollim Entertainment went via some intense drama this beyond summer in regards to the halting in their promotions, and now it turns out the duo have filed a lawsuit to terminate their contract.

TASTY filed the lawsuit against SM C&C, as it's miles the mum corporate of Woollim Entertainment, at the Seoul District Court.

Woollim answered to inform the media, "We have learned that TASTY have filed a lawsuit at the court to nullify their contract. We are flustered that this suit has been filed in a scenario where we can"t even get in contact with the members. We are getting ready a countersuit with our lawyers."

No explicit main points had been revealed so far, so remain tuned for updates. 

Get the maximum efficient of AKP on your inbox

#

Tasty Officially Files Lawsuit to finish Contract With Woollim

Tasty Officially Files Lawsuit to finish Contract With Woollim

Tasty Officially Files Lawsuit to End Contract With Woollim Chinese duo Tasty (twins Daeryong and Soryong) has officially filed a lawsuit against Woollim Entertainment’s parent company SM C&C to verify the invalidity in their exclusive contract, in line with felony assets on September 14. it's been decades coming because the duo first announced this July that they would now not be selling in Korea.

Tasty could be represented by way of Shinwon Law company in the approaching legal battles. in regards to the lawsuit from Tasty, Woollim mentioned to Celebrity News that they're making ready a countersuit with their lawyers. the primary court date has yet to be set.

Previously, following Tasty’s resolution to leave Korea, the duo and Woollim went from aspect to side with contradictory statements, the tension between the 2 already apparent, and when Tasty announced their Chinese unmarried release, Woollim spoke back with a promise of legal action.

Source (1)

Related

#

TASTY And Woollim Entertainment Continue To Clash Over Duo's Upcoming Release In China

TASTY And Woollim Entertainment Continue To Clash Over Duo's Upcoming Release In China

The battle between Chinese-Korean pop duo TASTY and Woollim Entertainment continues.

On July 22, TASTY"s Jung Daeryong and Jung Soryong uploaded screen captures of a KakaoTalk conversation to their official Twitter as evidence that they tried to contact their record label, Woollim Entertainment to no avail.

In the three uploaded screen caps, the pop star twin brothers show their attempts at calling the CEO of Woollim through the messaging app"s voice talk feature.They also show a conversation between the duo and an unnamed company official.

In a report by XSports News, TASTY explained that after they returned to China on June 3, they attempted contact with the CEO of Woollim on June 6. Then, on July 21 they had also tried to contact Woollim before announcing the upcoming release of their Chinese single. The tweets have since been deleted from TASTY"s account.

(Photo : TASTY Twitter)

Woollim Entertainment released an official statement in response. According to TVDaily, Woollim shared that TASTY still left for China without notice and then contacted the CEO to tell him that they wanted to cancel their contract. "It was a one-sided agreement," Woollim"s statement reads. "After a month without contact, TASTY declared the start of their Chinese activities also through SNS. Today, once again, they only use SNS to make statements that look like they tried to contact us."

The record company"s statement ends with a firm reminder that TASTY are still under contract and that releasing and promoting a Chinese album acts in violation of that contract.

Woollim has also asked for the group to talk to them directly and not just through phone and SNS services. TASTY have yet to reply to their request.

#

TASTY Announce Chinese Single Release This Month, Woollim Entertainment Remains In The Dark

TASTY Announce Chinese Single Release This Month, Woollim Entertainment Remains In The Dark

The twins of TASTY continue to make waves with the announcement of their Chinese single.

On July 21, the Chinese K-pop duo announced the release date of their upcoming single in China through their Weiboaccount. The two brothers posted three teaser photos to the Chinese social media site along with the confirmed release date of July 26.

In response to the teasers, Woollim Entertainment (TASTY"s management company in Korea) expressed "We"re shocked and dumbfounded," according to Newsen.

Earlier this month, the TASTY"s Daeryong and Soryong announced via social mediathat they were not be continuing their Korean activities. Immediately after, Woollim Entertainment claimed that TASTY"s decision was one-sided and that they were currently in the process of preparing another comeback for them. TASTY quickly refuted this claim as well.

TASTY debuted under Woollim Entertainment in 2012 and have released three songs since then. Their last comeback, "Addiction," was released in August 2014 in both Korean and Chinese.

Despite the confusion and sadness to see both boys leave Korea so suddenly, fans are excited to see what TASTY has to offer for their Chinese single.

TASTY is comprised of twin brothers Jung So-ryong (Chinese name Zheng Xiao-Long) and Jung Dae-ryong (Chinese name Zheng Da-Long) who were born and raised in Jilin, China before moving to train as pop stars in both South Korea and the United States. Before signing with Woollim, the pair were trainees with JYP Entertainment and served as back up dancers for the company"s CEO Park JinYoung.

(Photo : Weibo)

#

Woollim Entertainment releases professional commentary about TASTY

Woollim Entertainment releases professional commentary about TASTY"s in another country activities

Woollim Entertainment liberates reputable remark about TASTY

Woollim Entertainment has liberated an reputable remark addressing TASTY"s outdated accusations and out of the country activities. even though the firm has already said their stance at the topic, Woollim reiterated that TASTY made one-sided selections to advertise in China.

The label said on July 22:

"As TASTY"s firm, we"re freeing our reputable remark at the gang"s one-sided finish to their activities in Korea since early June and their promotions in China. in the beginning, the 2 individuals called Woollim Entertainment"s head on June five to inform him their one-sided demands after leaving to China without no longerice on June 3. Also after one month of no longer being in a position to touch them, they printed thru SNS that they would be selling in China and announced an album."

"News associated with their Chinese activities then become headlines locally negatively affecting public opinion, which is when we made touch back (July 21). even though TASTY are still below contract with Woollim Entertainment, it used to be said that "what TASTY are saying isn"t conversation yet a no longerification" and that "we must meet reputablely to speak." regardless of all this, they posted to SNS nowadays (July 22) as though they"ve been in touch with us all along."

"TASTY are lately still in an exclusive contract with Woollim Entertainment, and their Chinese promotions and album liberate are distinct contractual violations. We"re making it transparent that those movements are of label artists who are ignoring their contracts." Judging by means of Woollim Entertainment"s remark, it seems like the firm"s letting every person know that TASTY"s movements are unlawful. What are your mind at the topic?

Get the most efficient of AKP on your inbox

#