Former GFRIEND Trainee Ordered To Pay Firm For Quitting Pre-Debuthajima Might 2, 2016 0 Womanworkforce GFRIENDs agency, Source Music, has won a lawsuit opposed to a former trainee who used to bedecided on to be a member of GFRIEND, yetabruptlygive upahead of debuting.
The Seoul Central District Court has ordered former trainee A to pay the agency 12.5 million won (approximately $11,000), two timesthe quantity of cash paid for getting ready her for the group.
A, who won vocal and dance education afterward signing a momentarypractising contract with Source Tune in October 2013, met with the CEO in April of the subsequent year, saying, I would truly like to leisure at house and I can quit before failing to turn up for practice.
Source Music agreed with the former trainees facet to terminate the contract and notified them to publish the documents for contract cancellation and satisfy the breach of contract penalties. The common contract between the 2 parties states, In the case that A violates the terms of the contract by unilaterally breaking the contract, A can pay twice the volumeof prices invested via root Music up till the point of contract termination, as a penalty.
The agency filed a lawsuit against former trainee A after she failed to make any movementsin regards to the matter.
Source Music demanded 55.7 million won (approximately $49,000) over the prison process; the mixed amount of the penalty of twice the training costs for A (12.5 million won (approximately $11,000)) as smartly equallyfurther girl community training fees and hireled to by postponement of the teams debut from her departure (43.2 million won (approximately $38,000)).
Although A replied by announcing that, after she becamenot able to stay along of Source Musics commands for unrealistic short-term weight-loss, the former trainee says she was excluded from preparewhen they cited appearance issues. However, the court did no longersettle forthose statements as A was the one that violated the contract first.
The court ruled, Because A did no longergo back to practice and, thus, violated the contract, she should pay twice the quantity of the investment costs, according to the terms of the contract. However, the agencys demands for A to atone for the expenses from the not on time debut of GFRIEND was not acknowledged.
The court explained, The organization GFRIEND was planned as a seven-member group initially but, after finishing up with five contributors following the departure of A and any other trainee, the gangin the end debuted as a six-member group with the addition of a new member and, In mild of this fact, the delayed debut can not exist attributed only to A alone.
What do you consider this issue?
Related Tags GFRIENDPost NavigationOldTaleSM STATIONs Next Free up To Be EDM Track Wave Featuring f(x)s Amber And Luna
You are viewing the newest post