Share on FacebookShare on TwitterNetizens speak about the beyond mystery on whether Large hit Seungri drank or now notearlier than his vehicletwist of fate
Earlier we reported that YG Entertainment lost their lawsuit opposed to reporter known as K for libel and defamation via reports against YG and large BANG member Seungri. However, netizens have beganto determine irregularities in the incident of Seungris automobile accident.
Originally posted on Pann, netizens speak about the past incident of giant BANG Seungris car accident and the mystery in the back of on whether he drank or not prior to his accident.
Titled The fact of Seungri Who Brought aboutThe automobile Accident, here's the direct translation of the post and comments below.
There was once a file of the reporter getting all of his fees dropped regarding
libel against YG Entertainment and there are some irregularities in the article.
Here is the link: http://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=003aid=0007083018
Title: EXCLUSIVE NewshoundsRates Dropped For Alleged Defamation of BIG BANGSeungri and YG.
Seungri followed his lawsuit against the reporter K after the reporter brought up speculations of Seungri drinking prior to his accident on September of 2014 via reports and SNS.
Regarding the libel charges, the district attorney disagreed at the trial for those reasons: It's milestoughto peer that the use of pharmacy references back to YG generating drugs. Taking a look at the reality that male A worked in YG Entertainment prior to his arrest for cocaine use.
Also the defamation charges against the reporter were dropped after the reporter attained data that Seungri become drinking from his buddies and the fact that Seungri wasnt checked for driving under the impression of alcohol at the scene of the accident. Because of these reasons, they made up our minds that it is difficult to fee the reporter for making up lies for the point of defamation.
But whenever youglance at the item that was posted in September of 2014, the police responded to Seungris choice of ridingbeneath the influence of alcohol by stating:
We checked at him the scene. Not anythinggot here out. The rate of his vehicle was the problem. He admitted to his fault and that insurance will perfectly deal with it.
But todays article, the courts themselves explained that reporter K attained knowledge from Seungris chums that he was drinking prior to the accident and that Seungri wasnt checked for driving under the influence which have beenthe explanations why all of the charges were dropped for the reporter.
So they say that the police branch lied to the public right?
Koreaboo has gathered reactions from Netizens who commented on the normal article from our Korean source. The under comments are the maximumsmartly liked comments at the time of this newsletter being published.
80 / -7 At the time of the accident, there were witnesses that claimed they saw BIG BANG Seungri drinking before the accident. It was also printed that he wasnt checked for driving under the influence of alcohol and that he left by getting off the ambulance on the manner to the hospital.
72 / -10 This is horrifying YG is provokingas a result of this
66 / -4 I bet that they didnt take a appearance at him at the scene or maybe later on because he left the ambulance. Yet he were given IT checked after the police called him in for investigation. This is a trickery to shop for time. This may also be aapproach to get out of there onceimaginable on the ambulance and getting checked after alcohol is long past from the blood. He wasnt checked at the scene but checked after the police called him in the following day.
37 / -1 This still remains a mystery that makes me wonder. He comes out in most casesfor giant BANG after doing a one evening stand with a ladyor evendashing and causing a car accident.
37 / 0 Hello VIP cockroaches, forestallurgent the dislike button and check outto give coverage to your artist. They seeking to purpose vote tricks.
34 / -8 I betthey are in a position to exist called a pharmacy now right? hahahaahahaha Even the courts governed that libel and defamation can not be charged
22 / 0 There aren't any answers for VIP cockroaches.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter