Share on FacebookShare on TwitterNetizens speak about the beyond mystery on whether BIGBANG Seungri drank or now notearlier than his vehicle accident.
Earlier we reported that YG Entertainment lost their lawsuit opposed to reporter known as K for libel and defamation via reports against YG and BIGBANG member Seungri. However, netizens have beganto determine irregularities in the incident of Seungris automobile accident.
Originally posted on Pann, netizens speak about the past incident of huge BANG Seungris car twist of fate and the mystery in the back of on whether he drank or not prior to his accident.
Titled The fact of Seungri Who Brought aboutThe auto Accident, this is the direct translation of the post and comments below.
There was once a document of the reporter getting all of his fees dropped regarding
libel against YG Entertainment and there are some irregularities in the article.
Here is the link: http://entertain.naver.com/read?oid=003aid=0007083018
Title: EXCLUSIVE NewshoundsRates Dropped For Alleged Defamation of Giant BANGSeungri and YG.
Seungri followed his lawsuit against the reporter K after the reporter brought up speculations of Seungri drinking prior to his accident on September of 2014 via reports and SNS.
Regarding the libel charges, the district attorney disagreed at the case for those reasons: It's mileschallengingto look that the use of pharmacy references back to YG generating drugs. Taking a look at the reality that male A worked in YG Entertainment prior to his arrest for cocaine use.
Also the defamation charges against the reporter were dropped after the reporter attained data that Seungri changed into drinking from his pals and the fact that Seungri wasnt checked for driving under the affect of alcohol at the scene of the accident. Because of these reasons, they determined that it is difficult to fee the reporter for making up lies for the point of defamation.
But while youglance at the item that was posted in September of 2014, the police responded to Seungris choice of usingbeneath the influence of alcohol by stating:
We checked at him the scene. Not anythinggot here out. The velocity of his vehicle was the problem. He admitted to his fault and that insurance will perfectly cope with it.
But todays article, the courts themselves explained that reporter K attained knowledge from Seungris company that he was drinking prior to the accident and that Seungri wasnt checked for driving under the influence which have beenthe explanations why all of the charges were dropped for the reporter.
So they say that the police branch lied to the public right?
Koreaboo has amassed reactions from Netizens who commented on the customary article from our Korean source. The beneath comments are the maximumsmartly liked comments at the time of this newsletter being published.
80 / -7 At the time of the accident, there were witnesses that claimed they saw BIGBANG Seungri drinking before the accident. It was also printed that he wasnt checked for driving under the influence of alcohol and that he left by getting off the ambulance on the style to the hospital.
72 / -10 This is frightening YG is scary as a result of this
66 / -4 I bet that they didnt take a appearance at him at the scene or maybe subsequently because he left the ambulance. Yet he were given information technology checked after the police called him in for investigation. This is a trickery to shop for time. This can also be aoption to get out of there onceimaginable on the ambulance and getting checked after alcohol is long past from the blood. He wasnt checked at the scene but checked after the police called him in the following day.
37 / -1 This still remains a mystery that makes me wonder. He comes out generally for BIGBANG after doing a one evening stand with a womanor evenrushing and causing a car accident.
37 / 0 Hi there VIP cockroaches, forestallurgent the dislike button and check outto be offeringcoverage to your artist. They looking to purpose vote tricks.
34 / -8 I betthey are ready to exist called a pharmacy now right? hahahaahahaha Even the courts governed that libel and defamation can't be charged
22 / 0 There aren't any answers for VIP cockroaches.
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter